Lincoln, alone, opposed secession for these reasons:
1. Physically the states
cannot separate.
2. Secession is
unlawful.
3. A government that allows
secession will disintegrate into anarchy.
4. That Americans are not
enemies, but friends.
5. Secession would destroy the
world's only existing democracy, and prove for all time, to future Americans and
to the world, that a government of the people cannot survive.
Lincoln would not allow secession, regardless. The South viewed Lincoln as purporting a strong centralized Federal government that favored Northern interests. Many Southern states, which viewed Lincoln as a despot, now believed their suspicions of Lincoln had been confirmed.
Lincoln would not allow secession, regardless. The South viewed Lincoln as purporting a strong centralized Federal government that favored Northern interests. Many Southern states, which viewed Lincoln as a despot, now believed their suspicions of Lincoln had been confirmed.
The Supreme Court,
furthermore, not the President, was the final lawful arbiter regarding
secession. Lincoln had opinions for the Constitution, while the Supreme Court
possessed the legal right to interpret the Constitution. Lincoln thought
otherwise. See also: President Lincoln,
Secession, South Secedes, President
Abraham Lincoln in his own words from Civil Rights to
Secession, and Lincoln, Secession of
Southern States, and Causes of the Civil
War.
Listed below are some of the
comments that Lincoln made against secession.
Physically We Can Not
Separate
First Inaugural Address March 4, 1861
Physically speaking, we
cannot separate. We cannot remove our respective sections from each other nor
build an impassable wall between them. A husband and wife may be divorced
and go out of the presence and beyond the reach of each other; but the different
parts of our country cannot do this.
Secession is Unlawful
First Inaugural Address March 4, 1861
I hold that, in contemplation of universal law, and of the
Constitution, the union of these States is perpetual....It follows....that no
State, upon its own mere motion, can lawfully get out of the Union; that
resolves and ordinances to that effect are legally void; and that acts of
violence, within any State or States, against the authority of the United
States, are insurrectionary or revolutionary, according to circumstances. I,
therefore, consider that, in view of the Constitution and the laws, the Union is
unbroken.
First Inaugural Address March 4, 1861
We find the proposition that, in legal contemplation, the
Union is perpetual confirmed by the history of the Union itself. The Union is
much older than the Constitution. It was formed, in fact, by the Articles of
Association in 1774. It was matured and continued by the Declaration of
Independence in 1776. It was further matured, and the faith of all the thirteen
States expressly plighted and engaged that it should be perpetual, by the
Articles of Confederation in 1778. And, finally, in 1787, one of the declared
objects for ordaining and establishing the Constitution was "to form a more
perfect Union."
Message to Congress in Special Session July 4,
1861
The States have their status in the Union, and they have no
other legal status. If they break from this they can only do so against law and
by revolution.
Secession Equals
Anarchy
First Inaugural Address March
4, 1861
Plainly, the central idea of
secession is the essence of anarchy. A majority, held in restraint by
constitutional checks and limitations and always changing easily with deliberate
changes of popular opinions and sentiments, is the only true sovereign of a free
people. Whoever rejects it does of necessity fly to anarchy or despotism.
Unanimity is impossible; the rule of a minority, as a permanent arrangement, is
wholly inadmissible; so that, rejecting the majority principle, anarchy or
despotism in some form is all that is left.
Message to Congress in Special
Session July 4, 1861
The principle [secession]
itself is one of disintegration, and upon which no government can possibly
endure.
We Are Friends
First Inaugural Address March
4, 1861
Friends. I am loth to close.
We are not enemies, but friends. We must not be enemies. Though passion may have
strained it must no break our bonds of affection. The mystic chords of memory,
stretching from every battlefield, and patriot grave, to every living heart and
hearthstone, all over this broad land, will yet swell the chorus of the Union,
when again touched, as surely they will be, by the better angels of our
nature.
Secession Will Destroy Democracy
Indianapolis, Indiana February 11, 1861
In all trying positions in
which I shall be placed, and doubtless I shall be placed in many such, my
reliance will be upon...the people of the United States; and I wish you to
remember, now and forever, that it is your business, and not mine, that if the
union of these States and the liberties of these people shall be lost, it is but
little to any one man of fifty-two years of age, but a great deal to the thirty
millions of people who inhabit these United States, and to their posterity in
all coming time.
Indianapolis, Indiana February
11, 1861
I appeal to you again to
constantly bear in mind that not with politicians, not with Presidents, not with
office-seekers, but with you, is the question, Shall the Union and shall the
liberties of this country be preserved to the latest generations?
Message to Congress in Special
Session July 4, 1861
The distinct issue, "Immediate
dissolution or blood"...embraces more than the fate of these United States. It
presents to the whole family of man the question of whether a constitutional
republic or democracy -- a government of the people, by the same people -- can
or cannot maintain its territorial integrity against its own domestic foes. It
presents the question whether the discontented individuals -- too few in numbers
to control the administration, according to organic law, in any case -- can
always, upon the pretenses made in this case or on any other pretenses, or
arbitrarily without any pretense, break up the government and thus practically
put an end to free government upon the earth. It forces us to ask: "Is there, in
all republics, this inherent and fatal weakness? Must a government, of
necessity, be too strong for the liberties of its own people, or too weak to
maintain its own existence?"
Annual Message to Congress
December 1, 1862
Fellow-citizens, we cannot
escape history. We of this Congress and this administration, will be remembered
in spite of ourselves. No personal significance, or insignificance, can spare
one or another of us. The fiery trial through which we pass, will light us down,
in honor or dishonor, to the latest generation. We say we are for the Union. The
world will not forget that we say this. We know how to save the Union. The world
knows we do know how to save it. We -- even we here -- hold the power, and bear
the responsibility. In giving freedom to the slave, we assure freedom to the
free - honorable alike in what we give, and what we preserve. We shall nobly
save, or meanly lose, the last best hope of earth.
Lincoln's Thoughts and Opinions
Lincoln may have thought the fifth point was the most important. If you traveled the earth in 1860, and visited every continent and every nation, you would have found many examples of monarchies, dictatorships, and other examples of authoritarian rule. But in the all the world, you would have found only one major democracy: The United States of America. Democracy had been attempted in one other nation in the eighteenth century - France. Unfortunately, that experiment in self-government deteriorated rapidly, as the citizens resorted more to the guillotine than to the ballot box. From the ashes of that experiment in self-government, rose a dictator who, after seizing control in France, attempted to conquer the continent of Europe.
Those who supported monarchies felt vindicated by the French disaster, but the United States experiment in self-government remained a thorn in their side. Those wishing for democracy could always point across the ocean and say, "It works there. Why can't we try it here"? In 1860 however, it appeared that the thorn had been removed. The monarchists were thrilled with the dissolution of the United States, and many even held parties celebrating the end of democracy.
Lincoln's Thoughts and Opinions
Lincoln may have thought the fifth point was the most important. If you traveled the earth in 1860, and visited every continent and every nation, you would have found many examples of monarchies, dictatorships, and other examples of authoritarian rule. But in the all the world, you would have found only one major democracy: The United States of America. Democracy had been attempted in one other nation in the eighteenth century - France. Unfortunately, that experiment in self-government deteriorated rapidly, as the citizens resorted more to the guillotine than to the ballot box. From the ashes of that experiment in self-government, rose a dictator who, after seizing control in France, attempted to conquer the continent of Europe.
Lincoln understood this well, and when he described his nation as "the world's last best hope," these were not idle words. Lincoln truly believed that if the war were lost, it would not only have been the end of his political career, or that of his party, or even the end of his nation. He believed that if the war were lost, it would have forever ended the hope of people everywhere for a democratic form of government. See also: What Caused the Civil War: President Lincoln, War Powers, States' Rights and Secession and President Abraham Lincoln: History Homepage.
No comments:
Post a Comment